Cameron Students posing for a picture on Campus

Measure 2: Satisfaction of Employers and Stakeholder Involvement


The Oklahoma Educational Quality and Accountability (OEQA) office has developed a statewide survey of administrators who have hired initial program completers for all educator preparation programs across the state. Surveys are deployed in late spring of the completer’s first year of teaching. Items align directly to the InTASC standards with employers rating the extent to which they agree that each item is true about the specified first year teacher on a 4-point scale from Strongly Disagree (1) to Strongly Agree (4).

This survey was completed by an administrator/supervisor and a teacher/mentor working with a first-year teacher. As the administrator/supervisor, they are responsible for overseeing the professional growth, instructional effectiveness, and overall performance of the first-year educators. This includes providing formal evaluations, ensuring compliance with district and state expectations, and supporting the teacher’s successful transition into the profession.

Additionally, as a teacher/mentor, offers ongoing guidance, support, and encouragement to the first-year teacher. In this role, they assist with instructional planning, classroom management strategies, and professional development, while fostering reflective practices and continuous improvement. 

Of the 29 employer administrators of program completers, 75% both agreed or strongly agreed that CU’s first year teachers were effectively prepared through both their preparation and certification pathway to positively impact P-12 student learning and development. Responses from the remaining 25% (1) identified areas for improvement and are being used to inform ongoing program evaluation and continuous improvement efforts.


Planning and Preparation: Rate the degree you agree that [Teacher] was prepared to:

Agree or Strongly Agree

Demonstrate knowledge of content and pedagogy.

Agree

Demonstrate knowledge of students.

Agree

Set instructional outcomes.

Agree

Demonstrate knowledge of resources.

Agree

Design coherent instructions.

Agree

Design student assessments.

Agree


Classroom Environment: Rate the degree the [Teacher] was prepared to:

Agree or Strongly Agree

Create an environment of respect and rapport.

Agree

Establish a culture for learning.

Agree

Manage classroom procedures.

Agree

Manage student behavior.

Agree

Organize physical space.

Agree


Professional Responsibilities: Rate the degree the [Teacher] was prepared to:

Agree or Strongly Agree

Reflect on teaching.

Agree

Maintain accurate records.

Agree

Communicate with families.

Agree

Participate in professional community.

Agree

Grow professionally.

Agree

Show professionalism.

Agree


Science of Reading (Rate the degree to which you agree)

Agree or Strongly Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in oral language.

Strongly Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in concepts of print.

Strongly Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in phonemic awareness.

Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in phonics.

Strongly Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in explicit, systematic literacy instruction.

Strongly Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in vocabulary acquisition and text comprehension. 

Agree

The teacher was prepared to deliver high quality instruction in writing.

Agree

The teacher was prepared to administer and interpret diagnostic reading assessments for phonemic awareness, phonics, and reading fluency.

Agree

The teacher supports diverse learners (e.g., neurodiversity, linguistically diverse, gifted and talented, etc) with reading instruction and interventions.

Strongly Agree

Each spring, the EPP assembles a group of teacher education professionals to discuss their satisfaction with the educational leadership program completers hired by their districts. Comments from employers indicated that Cameron completers are very strong candidates. Employers note that the program builds a network of good resources and support after graduation for completers as well as doing a good job of providing completers with necessary fundamentals. In spring 2025, CU’s EPP invited local stakeholders that included current students, program completers, mentor teachers, university supervisors, and educational leadership professionals to an Annual Advisory Board meeting coordinated through Zoom. Following a case study model entitled “Swift Changes in 21st Century Educator Preparation,” stakeholders identified five primary areas for concern regarding initial and advanced program graduates who are entering into the teaching profession in post-pandemic environment. Emergent themes included the need for enhanced support in classroom management, trauma-informed instruction, preparedness within alternative certification pathways, integration of AI in the classroom, and strengthened training in special education.