Division is the process of breaking a whole into parts; classification is the act of sorting individual items into categories. In the following paragraph from "Fans," Paul Gallico divides sports fans into categories based on the different sports they watch.
Parts: Kinds of sports fans
Through classification and division, we can make sense of seemingly random ideas by putting scattered bits of information into useful, coherent order. By breaking a large group into smaller categories and bringing separate items together into particular categories, we are able to identify relationships between the whole and its parts and to recognize similarities and differences among the parts themselves. (Remember, though, that simply enumerating representative examples does not constitute classification; when you classify, you always sort individual examples into categories according to some grouping principle.)
In countless practical situations classification
and division brings order to chaos. Items in a Sunday newspaper are classified
in clearly defined sections-international news, sports, travel, entertainment,
comics, and so on-so that hockey scores, for example, are not mixed up
with real estate listings. Similarly, department stores are divided into
different departments so that managers can assign merchandise to particular
areas and shoppers can know where to look for a particular item. Without
such organization, an item might be anywhere in a store. Thus, order is
brought to newspapers and department stores-and to supermarkets, biological
hierarchies, and libraries-when a whole is divided into categories or sections
and individual items are assigned to one or another of these subgroups.
The interrelated processes of classification and
division invariably occur together; nevertheless, they are two separate
operations. When you classify, you begin with individual items and sort
them into categories. Most things have several different attributes, and
so they can be classified in any of several different ways. Take as an
example the students who attend your school. The most obvious way to classify
these individuals might be according to their year in college-fresh- man,
sophomore, junior, or senior. But you could also classify students according
to their major, racial or ethnic background, home state, grade point average,
political affiliation, or any number of other principles. The principle
of classification you choose would depend on how you wished to approach
the members of this large and diverse group.
Division is the opposite of classification. When
you divide, you start with a whole (an entire class) that you break into
its individual parts-smaller, more specific classes, called subclasses.
For example, you might start with the large general class television shows
and divide it into smaller subclasses: comedy, drama, action/adventure,
and so forth. You could divide each of these subclasses still further--
action/adventure programs, for example, might include westerns, police
shows, and so on--and each of these subclasses could be further divided
as well. Eventually you would need to determine a particular principle
to help you assign specific programs to one category or another--that is,
to classify them.
Guidelines for Classification and Division
2. All of the subclasses should be on the same level. In the series comedy, drama, action/adventure, and westerns, the last of these items, westerns, does not belong because it is on a lower level--that is, it is a subclass of action/adventure. Likewise, sophomores (a subclass of undergraduates) does not belong in the series undergraduates, graduate students, extension students.
3. You should treat all subclasses that are significant and relevant to your discussion and include enough subclasses to make your point, with no important omissions and no overlapping categories. In a review of a network's fall television lineup, the series sitcoms, soap operas, police shows, and detective shows is incomplete because it omits important subclasses like news programs, game shows, talk shows, and documentaries; moreover, detective shows may overlap with police shows. In the same way, the series freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and transfers is also illogical: The important group seniors has been omitted, while transfers may include freshmen, sophomores, and juniors.
Because of the way they are worded, certain topics and questions immediately suggest you use a classification-and-division pattern to structure your essay. Suppose, for example, you are asked, "What kinds of policies can be used to direct and control the national economy?" Here the word kinds suggests classification and division. Other words, such as types, varieties, and categories, can also serve as clues.
Structuring a Classification-and-Division Essay
Selecting and Arranging Categories
Formulating a Thesis
Planning and Organizing Your Essay
Thesis statement: Most readers know Mark Twain as a writer of novels such as Huckleberry Finn, but his nonfiction works--his travel narratives, his essays, his letters, and especially his autobiography--deserve more attention.
I. Travel narratives
A. Roughing It
B. The Innocents Abroad
C. Life on the Mississippi
II. Essays
A. "Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offenses"
B. "How To Tell A Story"
C. "The Awful German Language"
III. Letters
A. To W. D. Howells
B. To his family
IV. Autobiography
Because this will be a long term paper, each of the outline's divisions will have several subdivisions, and each subdivision might require several paragraphs.
This outline illustrates each of the characteristics of an effective
classification-and-division essay. To begin with, Twain's nonfiction works
are classified according to a single principle of classification- literary
genre. Depending on your purpose, of course, another principle--for example,
theme, subject matter, stage in Twain's career, or contemporary critical
reception--could have worked just as well. If you had written your term
paper for a political science course, for example, you might have decided
to examine Twain as a social critic by classifying his works according
to the amount or kind of political commentary in each. Literary genre,
however, is an appropriate principle of classification for the writing
situation at hand. (If you had arranged Twain's works into novels, essays,
short stories, letters, and political works, you would have mixed two principles
of classification-genre and content. As a result, a highly political novel
like The Gilded Age would have fit more than one category.) In addition
to being derived from a single principle of classification, all the paper's
subclasses are on the same level (you could not, for example, treat Twain's
essays, letters, autobiography, and Roughing It as your four major
divisions). And all relevant subclasses are included. Had you left out
the subclass essays, for example, you would have been unable to classify
several significant works of nonfiction.
Note too that this outline arranges the four subclasses so they will
support your thesis most effectively. Because you believe Twain's travel
narratives, though familiar to many readers, are somewhat overrated, you
plan to discuss them early in your paper. Similarly, because you think
the autobiography would make your best case for the merit of the nonfiction
works as a whole, you decide it would be most effective placed last. Of
course, you could have arranged your categories in several other orders,
such as shorter to longer works or least to most popular, depending on
the details of your argument.
Finally, this outline helps guide you to treat all of your categories
comparably in your paper. In fact, you should go on to verify this consistency
by identifying each main point in your rough draft and cross-checking the
order of points from category to category. Your case would be weakened
if, for example, you inadvertently skipped style in your discussion of
Twain's letters while including it for every other category. This omission
might lead your readers to suspect either that you could not discuss this
point because you had not done enough research on the letters or that you
had ignored the point because the style of Twain's letters did not measure
up somehow to the style of his other works.
Taken from Patterns for College Writing. 6th Ed. Ed. Laurie G. Kirszner and Stephen R. Mandell. New York: St. Martin's, 1995. 413-419.