Mon, Jan 26, 2004 - Vol 77, Issue 14 Home | News | Community | Voices | A & E | Diversions | Sports | Archives | About Us

 

Our Voice

Trash and Consequences

Behind the times: Lawton lags in trash trends

Businesses give new face to old waste

Fort Sill and Lawton combat recycling

 

 

 

Trash and Consequences
- by Jaime Willis & Angela Gradoz: Staff Writers

A Dr Pepper can, a pizza box and this newspaper. What do these items have in common?

Recycling.

In 1998, members of city council, the Wichita Mountains’ Sierra Club and Fort Sill exchanged ideas regarding the implementation of a recycling program in Lawton.

Dr. Lynn Musslewhite, former Cameron history professor, and Mayor Cecil Powell agreed that Musslewhite would chair a committee to research and study the various recycling programs of other cities, national and statewide, in order to create a feasible program for the Lawton area.

After several meetings, Fort Sill representatives offered the use of their recycling facility to Lawton.

In early 2000, a formal agreement between Lawton and Fort Sill was signed in recognition of their coalition to install a recycling program in Lawton.

“Fort Sill agreed to provide one recycling bin and to send trucks out from Fort Sill to carry back materials for recycling,” Musslewhite said. “In exchange, [Fort Sill] would keep the proceeds from the sale of recycled materials.”

“I felt strongly that Lawton, the city itself, needed a recycling program,” Powell said. “We have a landfill south of Lawton, and those cells we haul our trash to are very expensive to the taxpayers to build.”

According to Jerry Ihler, director of public works, a cell is 3.5 acres, which must be lined in accordance wiith regulations, and the landfill is divided into such cells. Powell mentioned that three were currently prepared for use, along with the purchase of 600 additional acres. Ihler noted that the preparation for each of the three cells was an estimated $2.5 million, and that the cells can reach a depth of 40 feet and be filled to a height of 50 feet from ground level.

While the first cell is expended, the second is currently being filled. The overall cell lifetime for the three cells is 10 years, with roughly seven years remaining. As cells are filled, more are prepared.

“The 600 acres should provide us an additional 40 to 50 years,” Mike Shaw, deputy director of public works, said.

Powell noted that 40 percent of the trash taken to the landfill is recyclable; however, Shaw said it was much higher.

“Anything that goes into the landfill could be recycled,” Shaw said.

For the past 13 years, Fort Sill had been operating its own recycling program, and since it was not running to its full capacity, Powell, along with the committee, felt their joint efforts could be beneficial to the post as well as Lawton.

“It’s kind of expensive getting into the recycling program,” Powell said. “We’re called Lawton/Fort Sill, aren’t we; we’re one. If there is already a recycling program there, why duplicate it?”

Through their partnership Lawton/Fort Sill has designated three drop-off locations for recyclable items. These locations accept aluminum and steel cans, newspapers and magazines, cardboard and office paper. The Ft. Sill drop-off collects all these plus plastic and glass.

Despite the endeavors of the Sierra Club, city council and mayor, the recycling program has waned.

“We got off to a good start, but efforts have dwindled,” Musslewhite said. “The program has lost momentum.”

Bill Barwick, former manager of Fort Sill Recycling Center, believes this loss of motivation has caused a standstill in Lawton’s current recycling program. Possible improvements rest in the hands of the city council, as well as the people.

“There is nobody in the city government that tries to make recycling an issue, no advocates for recycling,” Barwick said. “You have got to make the customer want to recycle.”

Richard Null, supervisor of Fort Sill Recycling Center, said, “The biggest drawback is, ‘Why can’t people come on post, recycle their stuff on post or even downtown?’ We could have more people working for us which in turn is more revenue to the city because [workers] are going to buy stuff downtown.”

The current recycling program is run on a voluntary basis; however, Powell said he would like to see a mandatory recycling program somewhere in the distant future.

Despite the efforts to establish a successful recycling program, some feel that voluntary is not enough.

Since the voluntary program’s start, 50 tons of recyclable items a year have been collected from these three sites, according to Shaw; however, 500 tons of garbage reach the landfill a day.

“Mandatory is the only way to go,”said Amy Ewing-Holmstrom, city council representative for Ward Four. “People aren’t going to recycle if money is not involved.”

Until the establishment of a mandatory recycling program , Powell feels that educating the community of Lawton on the benefits of recycling is the only option.

According to Null, educating civilians that commuting on post is possible with a valid driver’s license is important. Because a decal is not required to enter the post, civilians will more than likely undergo a vehicle inspection.

However, accessing Fort Sill is not the only obstacle advocates for recycling face; there is no incentive for recycling. The overall mentality of the community, according to Ewing-Holmstrom, is simply stated as this:

“Since I am not getting paid for recycling, why should I do it?”

 

Page designed and maintained by Ian Mitchell - ianwebdesign@hotmail.com